Well, that was quite a little session between Brooks and RJ, wasn't it? But Brooks was right, RJ, you completely missed my point. The POINT of the post was that I am not now going to do what most Dem's are doing; try to pretend that the results of this election didn't happen. I accept that it did, that more people in this country have different ideals than I do, and that things are not going to go the way I'd prefer them to over the next four years. Would you like me to explain? Okay.
I am violently opposed to our presence in Iraq. We went "because Saddam had WMD's". Bullshit. No he didn't. Okay, it was bad info, but what do you say to the thousands of Iraqis that have lost their lives, and the more than one thousand American soldiers that have lost theirs? Whoops? My bad?? Come on!I will NEVER believe that war is an acceptable answer for any conflict. There has never been a war to end all wars; never been a war that brought lasting peace. When you take and eye for an eye, there is still another eye to be repaid...and so on forever. (and just as a side note, in case you're deluded about this too, Saddam didn't bomb the WTC...I know that in some "red state" minds, Bin Laden and Saddam seem to be the same man, but they're not. Hate to break it to you, because I am sure in your mind he's a great man and can do no wrong, but there is a greater connection between Bush and Osama, than Saddam and Osama. The war in Iraq is NOT fighting terror, it's polarizing a people against America in a way that was never present before we invaded, and NOW, there really are terrorists plotting against America in Iraq...why???? Because we INVADED THEIR COUNTRY/ KILLED THEIR PEOPLE/ AND DESTROYED THEIR CITIES. But, it's good for Haliburton, so let's not worry too much about that, eh?)
I don't hold homosexuals in some "too evil to consider as a normal human being" box, as the Republicans seem to do. A gay man or woman can't teach elementary school?? Funny, I can't seem to remember any time from my childhood as I was learning how to spell "CAT" that my teachers' sexuality came up. Hmmm...nope. No they never seemed to talk about whomever they were sleeping with at the time. Did that happen to you? Yeesh. No I seem to remember it being a big thing when I realized my teachers had first names! Let alone their sexual preference, I didn't believe they existed off campus! Is it the kids that would be corrupted by this situation, or the small-minded parents? A single mother can't teach either? But, I guess, a single father could, right? Would the Republican party be more comfortable if we just went straight back to the 50's? Better yet, how about you guys go, and the rest of us will stay here?
Republicans seem to want to stop the march of progress, out of fear and ignorance mostly. Whether it be abortion or stem-cell research, the human body is a complex science that we still don't fully understand. There was a time when it was thought evil to cut the body open (i.e. surgery), and this research had to be done in secret until it was socially acceptable. But when your wife (assuming you have one) went into labor, you didn't take her to your church, did you? No. You went to the hospital, where they helped her through the process employing all the wonders of modern science, all of which were challenged at some point as being "against God's plan". Time moves forward, and the things we thought were so radical at the time now are a part of everyday life, everyday living. Great men have been vilified for even suggesting such heritical things like "the world is round!" and "the earth goes 'round the sun!". And the men who tried to silence them in their time are now just looked upon as being small-minded and scared. Worried you might one day be in the same category?
Gosh, I could go on and on about the fundamental differences in ideals separating this country. I could say mean things like, "Say, did you happen to notice the 'blue states' seemed to be concurrent with this country's education centers, and that maybe has something to do with 'red state' voters being generally uninformed and in a really easy place to judge things like 'fighting terror' because, lucky for them, they are NOWHERE NEAR anything that might be targeted in an attack?"
But I am not going to...or maybe I just did.
The POINT is, you believe in different things than I do. We once again have elected a president that believes in different things than I do. But that doesn't make him "not my president". I can't live in a separate America (as utopian an idea that might be). I live here, in this America, with this president. My voice has been silenced for the next few years, quite effectively, I might add. But I am not going to go away, and neither is the rest of the "other half" of this country. When really looked at, our electoral map is just many shades or purple, because there are many shades of voters our there. There was a poll taken that when given the choice between Bush, Kerry, and Not Bush, Not Bush won, resoundingly.
You want me to regret our choice of candidate? How about the regret you'll feel when your "candidate" helps launch this country in to World War 3 on the heels of his devastating foreign policy? How about the regret you'll feel 20 years from now when this whole gay-rights issue is a thing of that past and people look back and marvel at how pig-headed and medieval we were in this time for having let this issue be unresolved for so long, because you'll have to know then that you were one of the many that was filled with so much misplaced fear that rationality clouded your judgment and compassion?
I'll never regret supporting John Kerry, because John Kerry spoke for me and the things I believe in. Maybe you should examine why you need to spend so much time trying to convince me that I am wrong, when my opinion won't change the outcome of the election one bit. Maybe a part of you is sick of being a repbulican, sick of being considered the "evil, uneducated, war-mongering" party, and maybe there is a part of you that wishes you could be where I am. Because I come from a place of tolerance, understanding, acceptance, and vision, and thirty years from now when my generation is running the country (provided we still have one to run), you'll only be able to sit back on your South Dakota porch in your rocking chair, grousing about the "state of affairs these days", but really you just be speaking to thin air, unheard, unheeded, and dismissed. And MAYBE, maybe then, you might understand how I feel RIGHT NOW.
ps- You might be better of reading Coulter's blog...I think she might be more your speed.